History Of The L. F. Nexus Research Center

Ninth Generation Library Grew Into The Tenth Generation Research Center

Eight Generation Grew Into The Ninth Generation

Seventh Generation Spawned The Eight Generation

Sixth Generation Morphed Into The Seventh Generation

Fifth Generation Morphed Into The Sixth Generation

=====================================================

Previous L. F. Nexus Generations Home Pages & Portals

Fourth Generation Home Page

Third Generation Home Page

Second Generation Home Page – Modernized

Second Generation Home Page – Original

First Generation Home Page

Original article:

History Of The L. F. Nexus Research Center

©2014 The L. F. Nexus Historical Research Center: 11g. All Rights Reserved.

Computer-Picked Related Post(s) (more relevant to less):

  1. The Fifth Generation Is Ready To Use
  2. Research Center Whiteboard
  3. What We Update & Revise
  4. L. F. NEXUS / We have begun wo…
  5. Prior Generations

What Is Islam?

Islam is a primitive, psychologically enslaving religion of peoples still living in the Dark Ages. The teachings of Islam are contradictory, which results in the instability and unpredictability of the Islamic population. Islam is divided into several sects, some worse than others. A follower of Islam is called a “Muslim.”

Muslims Want Footbaths Everywhere

Muslims want footbaths everywhere. To that we say, “No way, ho-zay!” If you desperately need footbaths everywhere, GO BACK HOME! Americans have had enough of your <EABNU (Expletive Appropriate But Not Used)>! And stop washing your feet in our public sinks, you morons!

Warning To Some Supreme Court Justices

To Some Supreme Court Justices:

If you make even one decision forbidding us from condemning Gay-perverts:

We will remove you from office.

Death Penalty For Gay-Perverts!

No, we don’t believe in the death penalty for Gay-perverts, though that is what they deserve. We just wanted to make the Gay-perverts hysterical. Why? Because they have been brainwashing millions of American children and young people into believing Gay-perverts are normal and because they have turned a number of American children and young people into Gay-perverts.

“Gay-Pervert” For The Squeamish

We’ve created the following graphic for the squeamish, who believe that Gay-perverts are normal people and don’t like to hear the word “Gay-pervert.”

gaypervert

Report From Agent J, One Of Our Spies At The APA

Agent J, one of our spies at the APA (American Psychiatric Association), reported the following today:

As of today, Monday, February 24, 2014, the APA employs:

  • 23 pedophiles (child rapists [7 with convictions and prison time])
  • 17 rapists (adult rapists)
  • 29 atheists
  • 43 Gay-perverts

Are Gay-Perverts Mentally Ill?

Are Gay-perverts mentally ill? Well, first, we must define the term “mentally ill.” “Mentally ill” means:

Being one who suffers from a disease (an internal cause of injury to oneself) of the mind.

Gay-perverts experience an immoral craving for same-sex intimacy. This immoral craving causes them physically and mentally injurious anguish and guilt. The mental injury takes the form of diminished cognitive (mental) ability. The physical injury is a degree of loss of physical health.

The claims that the anguish and guilt arise from external causes and, thus, that Gay-perverts have no mental disease is easily refuted by the fact that:

Gay-perverts experience anguish and guilt in decadent societies, which have no external causes.

Therefore:

Yes, Gays are mentally ill.

Why We Use The Word “Gay-Pervert”

In 1950, the first Gay activists said:

We need a happy word to delude people into believing that homosexuals are not evil, wicked perverts. Therefore, let’s call ourselves “Gays.”

In 1950, the common meaning of the word “Gay” was “joyful.” Well, those 1950 Gay activists and later Gay activists were very successful in deluding many people.

Now, we needed to find an honest word to reeducate the deluded in the true nature of homosexuals. Since Gays are perverts we came up with the word “Gay-pervert.”

Investigation Of Gays: Morality Versus Politics

One’s political stance (position) should be informed (guided) by moral truth. However, political positions are sometimes informed (guided) by competing (conflicting) moral truths. In such cases, one must find the “righteous compromise” between the competing moral truths. Thus, the right to privacy keeps us from investigating Gay-perverts just because they claim to be Gay-perverts.

Have Some Supreme Court Justices Really Discriminated In Favor Of Gay-Perverts?

Have some Supreme Court Justices really discriminated in favor of Gay-perverts? Well, listen to someone who should know, Justice Antonin Scalia. Justice Scalia said that the Supreme Court has:

…largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda.

What Should Be Our Policy On Gay-perverts?

What should be our political stance on Gay-perverts?

  1. We should not investigate them.
  2. Leaders, teachers, educators, etc. that seek to brainwash our children into believing being a Gay-pervert is normal should be stopped by any means whatsoever, short of maiming or killing these brainwashers.
  3. People should be educated in the truth about Gay-perverts and Gay-pervert activists from the public record – Satinover, Laumann, APA legal briefs, etc., etc.
  4. Supreme Court Justices that have discriminated in favor of Gay-perverts should be removed from office.
  5. Laws in favor of Gay-perverts should be rescinded (reversed).

Does A Good Candidate Have To Be A Perfect Candidate?

Well, I think that we should always start out looking for the perfect candidate. However, at some point, people’s ideas of what is perfect will clash. At that point, we need to ask ourselves, “What qualifications are indispensable?” Well, what qualifications will save lives?

Fighting abortion will save lives. Fighting Gay-perverts will not. Therefore, fighting abortion is more important than fighting Gay-perverts. Eliminating the national debt will save lives. This is because a future national debt will deprive people of money for food and the other necessities of life. So, fighting the national debt is more important than fighting Gay-perverts.

National Debt Versus Balanced Budget

The national debt and a balanced budget are obviously connected. A balanced budget would be the most important step we could take to eliminate our national debt. This fact should guide our policy decisions; especially, in elections and, especially, in the 2014 and 2016 elections.

American Psychiatric Association Explains Nothing

In 1973, some, not all, of the psychiatrists at the APA, the American Psychiatric Association, declared that “Gays” (Gay-perverts) were normal. However, they never explained to anyone how they arrived at this conclusion and have refused to explain ever since.

APA Lawyers Lie To Supreme Court

In the case of Lawrence v. Texas (2003), a “Gay” case (see Important Supreme Court Pervert Decisions), APA (American Psychiatric Association) lawyers lied(1) to the Supreme Court but liberals on the Supreme Court believed them!  Are these liberal Justices stupid or just plain corrupt.  Either way they need to be removed from office.

1Proof of the lies is found in Satinover and Laumann.

American Psychiatric Association

The American Psychiatric Association now believes that people are machines without free will and demands that everyone follow their teachings.  In other words, they have become a cult.

Association of Gay and Lesbian Psychiatrists

Guess who the Association of Gay and Lesbian Psychiatrists is a part of? The American Psychiatric Association.  And you expect scientific objectivity from the American Psychiatric Association?!

Firing Justice Kennedy & His Friends

Today, we plant the seed to remove Justice Kennedy and his friends from the Supreme Court. The charges are:

Willful gross incompetence in evaluating research on human sexuality and discrimination in favor of perverts.

Vital Message To Patriots

Fellow Patriots,

Whether or not Chris Christie is our candidate in 2016, it is vital that we post the “Who Would Be Worse?” image (graphic) that appears toward the top of our website on 10 million websites this year. This will both help Governor Christie, an honorable man, and help to crush Hillary Clinton’s efforts to win the presidency, where she would continue the miserably failed policies of the Democratic Party.

PS: Use our American Political Intelligence think tank to help win both the 2014 state elections and the 2016 presidential election.

PSS: The Democratic Party does not play fair. I should know, I live in Chicago. Also, on a personal note, they wouldn’t let me vote many years ago when I turned 18.

Cordially,

Dr. Michael Bisconti

Justice Kennedy’s Stupidity

Justice Kennedy wrote, “The state cannot demean their [Gays’] existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime.”  His stupidity is, in part, in affirming “their [Gays’] existence.”  Understand what Justice Kennedy was saying.  He was saying that Gays exist; that is, that Gays can’t help themselves.  Why, then, Justice Kennedy, do 99+% of “Gay men” sleep with women (see Satinover for proof [data]; search Satinover on the phrase “less than 1% do not” without the quotes)?

Directory: Departments: Frozen List

Directory: Departments: Frozen List

Past Libraries

Original article: Directory: Departments: Frozen List

©2014 The L. F. Nexus Historical Research Center: 11g. All Rights Reserved.

Computer-Picked Related Post(s) (more relevant to less):

  1. Research Center Whiteboard
  2. Directory: Departments: Expanding List
  3. Directory: All Floors: Expands Daily
  4. Posts Titles List
  5. Directories

“Who Would Be Worse?” Image Correction

We have masked the face of a deceased person in the “Who Would Be Worse?” image (graphic).  If you used our code, the image on your website will auto-correct.  If you copied and pasted, you will have to recopy and repaste.

Christie Versus Hillary

Power Coalition Renamed
“Sane Majority”

The Power Coalition has joined the Sane Majority and now the new, combined organization is called by the name of the latter – the Sane Majority. The Sane Majority still stands for the policies at Standards. Here are some other things the Sane Majority stands for:

  • Moral Principle: Choose good over evil.
  • Love Principle: Choose love over nonlove.
  • Pain Principle: Choose nonpain over pain.
  • Safety Principle: Choose safety over nonsafety.
  • Biological Use Principle: Choose the biologically indicated function over the biologically unindicated function. (For example, a man is biologically designed for a woman and a woman is biologically designed for a man.)
  • Psychological Use Principle: Choose the psychologically indicated function over the psychologically unindicated function. (For example, a man is psychologically designed for a woman and a woman is psychologically designed for a man.)
  • Perversion Principle: It is possible for a person to swap sane principle for insane principle.
  • Heterosexuality Principle: Heterosexuality is consistent with the Biological Use Principle and the Psychological Use Principle.
  • Homosexuality Principle: Homosexuality is inconsistent with the Biological Use Principle and the Psychological Use Principle.
  • Homosexual Perversion Principle: Homosexuality is proof of the Perversion Principle.
  • Ethicist Principle: Ethicists deal with questions of what is right, what is wrong, what is sane (right and natural), and what is insane (wrong and unnatural), as a science. Note that some clergymen, by their training and experience if not by their title, are ethicists and some of them are pneumiatric ethicists (if an ethicist is not a member of the American Pneumiatric Association, they are not a pneumiatric ethicist).
  • Ethicist Limitation Principle: An ethicist does not necessarily have more ability to judge what is right, wrong, sane, or insane than the average person.
  • Homosexual Spectrum Principle: There are degrees of severity of the mental illness of homosexuality.
  • Humanity Principle: Human life is a combination of visible and invisible aspects. The visible aspect is seen. The invisible aspect is proven by the fact that it cannot be accounted for by what is seen and can only be accounted for by what is not seen.
  • Invisibility Principle: No one can know when the invisible begins because the knowledge of the existence of the invisible always follows the advent of the invisible and there is no way to measure the amount of time that has passed between the advent of the invisible and the knowledge of the existence of the invisible.
  • Life Invisibility Principle: No one can know when the invisible aspect of life begins because the knowledge of the existence of the invisible aspect of life always follows the advent of the invisible aspect of life and there is no way to measure the amount of time that has passed between the advent of the invisible aspect of life and the knowledge of the existence of the invisible aspect of life.
  • Life Principle: No one can know when human life begins since no one can know when the invisible aspect of life begins.
  • Belief Power Principle: Belief, in the absence of the possibility of knowledge and in the presence of the demand for belief by one or more principles of sanity, has the authority of knowledge.
  • Life Belief Principle: The existence of human life is a matter of belief that has the authority of knowledge and is not a matter of knowledge.
  • Nonlife Belief Principle: The nonexistence of human life is a matter of belief that has the authority of knowledge and is not a matter of knowledge.
  • Life Uncertainty Principle: The uncertainty of the existence of life is a matter of belief that has the authority of knowledge and is not a matter of knowledge.
  • Universality Principle: The ability to judge what is sane or insane is possessed by the vast majority of human beings.
  • Ordinary Principle: The ability to judge what is sane or insane does not require special training.
  • Psychiatry Principle: A psychiatrist does not necessarily have more ability to judge what is sane or insane than the average person.
  • Competence Principle: This principle deals with competence, not sanity. Competence is not sanity. Competence is “the ability to tell the difference between right and wrong.” A psychiatrist might have more ability to judge whether a person is competent than the average person. The psychiatrist might be aware of something of which the average person is unaware; for example, a brain tumor but brain tumors and all other medical conditions only relate to competence, not sanity.
  • Psychiatry Limitation Principle: A psychiatrist does not necessarily have more ability to judge whether a person is competent than the average person. This principle was added for the sake of clarity.
  • Neurology Principle: A neurologist, by the fact that by definition they devote more time to the study and practice of neurology than a psychiatrist, may be more qualified to judge whether a person is competent than a psychiatrist.
  • Neurology Limitation Principle: A neurologist does not necessarily have more ability to judge whether a person is competent than the average person.
  • Neurology Psychiatry Limitation Principle: A neurologist does not necessarily have more ability to judge whether a person is competent than a psychiatrist. This principle was added for the sake of clarity.
  • God Principle: Belief in the nonexistence of God is insane because it is based on an insane belief, the insane belief that one has examined every part of the universe and found that there was no God.
  • Money Principle: Money is not evil.
  • Sex Principle: Sex, that is, sexual intercourse, is, inherently (in itself), neither good nor evil but, at the same time, sex, in terms of its marital context, is good or evil.

Can A Supreme Court Justice Be Removed From Office?

Can a Supreme Court Justice be removed from office?  Yes, a Supreme Court Justice may be impeached by the House of Representatives and, then, removed from office by the Senate for the same types of offenses that would trigger proceedings against any other government official under Article I and II of the Constitution.

Willful gross incompetence in evaluating research on human sexuality and discrimination in favor of perverts are such offenses.

Enhanced “Who Would Be Worse?” Image Code

We’ve enhanced our “Who Would Be Worse?” image code:

<p style="text-align: center;"><a
href="http://americanpoliticalintelligence.com"
><img alt="Christie Versus Hillary"
 src="http://americanpoliticalintelligence.com/images/worse.jpg"
 width="550" height="324" /
></a></p>

Christie Versus Hillary

Important Supreme Court Pervert Decisions

One, Inc. v. Olesen (1958)

The U.S. Post Office and the FBI deemed One: The Homosexual Magazine, a lesbian, gay, and bisexual publication, obscene, and as such could not be delivered via U.S. mail. The publishers of the magazine sued, and lost both the first case and the appeal.  The Supreme Court accepted the case and reversed it, marking the first time the Supreme Court ruled in favor of homosexuals.

Bowers v. Hardwick (1986)

The Supreme Court ruled 5–4 that consenting adults do not have a constitutional right to engage in homosexual acts in private, upholding a Georgia law.  The majority said the “right of privacy” under the Due Process Clause does not give homosexuals the right to engage in sodomy.  The “right to privacy” protects intimate marital and familial relations, but the Court said it does not cover gay sodomy because “no connection between family, marriage, or procreation on the one hand and homosexual activity on the other has been demonstrated.”  This decision, considered a serious blow to the gay-rights movement, was overturned in 2003’s Lawrence v. Texas decision.

Romer v. Evans (1996)

In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court struck down Colorado’s Amendment 2, which denied gays and lesbians protections against discrimination, calling them “special rights.”  According to Justice Anthony Kennedy, “We find nothing special in the protections Amendment 2 withholds.  These protections . . . constitute ordinary civil life in a free society.”

Boy Scouts of America v Dale (2000)

In another setback to the gay-rights movement, the Court ruled 5–4, that the Boy Scouts of America have a constitutional right to ban gays because the organization’s opposition to homosexuality is part of its “expressive message.”

Lawrence v. Texas (2003)

The Supreme Court, 6–3, overruled a Texas sodomy law and voted 5–4 to overturn 1986’s Bowers v. Hardwick decision.  “The state cannot demean their [gays’] existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime,” wrote Justice Kennedy in the majority opinion.  In his dissent to Lawrence v. Texas, Justice Scalia said the court has “largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda.”

United States v. Windsor (2013)

The Supreme Court ruled that the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional.  In a 5 to 4 vote, the court ruled that DOMA violated the rights of gays and lesbians.  The court also ruled that the law interferes with the states’ rights to define marriage.  It was the first case ever on the issue of gay marriage for the Supreme Court.  Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. voted against striking it down as did Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas.  However, conservative-leaning Justice Anthony M. Kennedy voted with his liberal colleagues to overturn DOMA.

Hollingsworth v. Perry (2013)

The Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage opponents in California did not have standing to appeal the lower court ruling that overturned the state’s ban, known as Proposition 8.  The ruling will remove legal battles for same-sex couples wishing to marry in California. However, the ruling did not directly affect other states.