Killing Rule

A martialist may never kill another human being except to protect themself and/or another or others from a present attack against themself and/or another or others. See The Accidental Vigilante.

Proportional Force Rule

Martial action should be proportional in force to the severity of the offense. The offense of diminishing someone’s health should be met with less force than the offense of attempting to murder someone. See The Accidental Vigilante.

The Myth That Evolution Disproves The Bible

Well, first, of course, evolution is not fact. But, if it were, so what? The Bible teaches, like evolution (and before Darwin), that the human body is made up of the same elements and compounds found in the soil. It also teaches that the human body was formed before the human soul. Therefore, if evolution were true, the human body would have evolved and, then, God would have given the evolved body a soul.

Since this is all true, why do we fight evolution? We fight evolution because its supporters teach that it is a fact or that it is more than a hypothesis.

Do We Want Evolution To Die?

Do we want evolution to die? No, but we wouldn’t shed any tears if it did. What we want is for evolution to be treated realistically; that is, it is an hypothesis, not a theory, and you may use hypotheses in the laboratory but you don’t teach them in science classes.

UPAX And Super Mind: The Human Psynome Project (SMHSP or HSP for short)

Super Mind: The Human Psynome Project (SMHSP or HSP for short) was headed up by UPAX (United States Psychiatric Association).

The Bully Hiding In The Corner: The NIMH

The NIMH (National Institute Of Mental Health) has been able to keep a low profile for years. Not anymore, however. It turns out that they are just as incompetent and corrupt as the APA (American Psychiatric Association).

Words Or Guns: Your Choice

America, if you don’t fight now with words against the lunatics who have infiltrated (crept into) all branches of our government and are hiding among the decent people in our government, you will have to fight the lunatics with guns later.

The choice is yours!

One More Reason To Hate The Democratic Party: Forced Mental Health Care

The Democratic Party has plans to force everyone to submit to their idea (atheistic and sexually perverted) of mental health care. The day they try that there will be blood in the streets and it won’t be our blood.

Freedom before peace!

Mental Health Versus Brain Health

While mental health and brain health are two different things, they do affect each other.

  • Brain health assures the unobstructed and unimpeded use of the mind, whether or not the mind is healthy.
  • Mental health assures that one takes care of themselves physically, which includes taking care of the brain.

Why the APA and the NIMH Fail At Mental Health

The reason the APA (American Psychiatric Association) and the NIMH (National Institute of Mental Health) fail at mental health is that they try to treat two different sciences as the same science. That is, they try to treat brain science and mind science as the same thing.

Brain science and mind science are not the same thing.

Brain science deals with the health of the brain. Mind science deals with the wholeness of the mind.

Now, health and wholeness are two different things.

Wholeness is not health.

Wholeness is the completeness of the complex (a set of interacting things) of abilities of the human mind.

To be mentally ill is actually, to one degree or another, to be mentally disabled. Mental illness (mental disability) requires rehabilitation ([mental] retraining), not recovery ([physiological] rebuilding).

The main idea of wholeness is:

Complete ability.

The main idea of mental health, which is a poorly chosen term for what we are really dealing with and which should be called mental wholeness is:

Complete ability of the mind.

Now, what the stupid, moronic APA and NIMH are trying to do is to give people mental ability through drugs . What utter nonsense!

APA and NIMH Humiliated: Super Mind: The Human Psynome Project (SMHSP or HSP for short)

Members of the APA (American Psychiatric Association) and the NIMH (National Institute of Mental Health) were not qualified to participate in Super Mind: The Human Psynome Project (SMHSP or HSP for short). This is not suprising given that these organizations promote the ridiculous chemistry-based approach to mental health and have little regard for the sane insight-based approach to mental health. The strong atheistic influence in these organizations explains why they reject everything they cannot see or touch. We expect they’ll be telling us next that there is no such thing as air since we cannot see air and there is no such thing as love since we cannot put love in a test tube.

New Proof Of The Mind Brain Split

The Human Psynome Project (SMHSP or HSP for short) has established with absolute certainty that the mind and the brain have distinct types of DXA (psynomes [conceptual substructures of the human mind]) that prohibit them from sharing the same identity. In laymen’s terms:

The mind and the brain are two different things.

In addition, the stretchability of both physical and mental space is confirmed so that we now know that an intermaterial interface exists between the mind and the brain that implies the paradoxical mental nature of physical reality with a potential, incredibly, for mental DXA to override physical DNA or in laymen’s terms:

Mind over matter.

This portends the indivisibility of matter, which means that the laws of physics are simply one “dream” of an infinite number of possible dreams of reality, which means, apart from the divine rulership of the universe, that:

Anything is possible.

Of course, we believe in divine rulership so that:

Only some things are possible, though still infinite in number.

Super Mind: The Human Psynome Project (SMHSP or HSP for short)

Today, Monday, March 24, 2014, at 12:00 noon precisely, Dr. Bisconti announced the final breakthrough that completes a 50-year analytical study of the human mind. This advances Super Mind: The Human Psynome Project (SMHSP or HSP for short) to the point where chemical psychiatry is now a thing of the past. (Sorry, pharmaceutical companies, you just lost a trillion dollars.)

Super Mind: The Human Psynome Project uses concepts analogous to biological concepts but which are not in any way biological. Super Mind: The Human Psynome Project (SMHSP or HSP for short) is an American scientific research project with the goals of determining the chronological sequence of psybase pairs (pschological base pairs (“building blocks of the mind”]) that make up human DXA (the conceptual substructure of the human mind) and of identifying and mapping all of the psygenes (psybase pair complexes [psybase pair aggregates {psychological base pair aggregates}]) of the human psynome (DXA) from transcendental, cerebral, and functional standpoints.

To begin to provide better understanding of the concepts involved, here are the mental structures, in governing order from most powerful to least powerful:

  1. mind
  2. DXA (psynomes): the conceptual substructure of the human mind; called also a “psynome”; the mind consists of aggregates of DXA (psynomes)
  3. psygene: a psybase pair complex (psychological base pair aggregate); DXA (psynomes) is made up of psygenes
  4. psybase pair: a psychological base pair; a “building block of the mind”; psygenes consist of psybase pairs

One of the most critical discoveries/implications of HSP is that the brain is the servant of the mind and not, as medical science has taught for 200 years, the other way around.

Needless to say, we have much more information to provide on HSP.

Footnote: Dr. Bisconti notes that it was an American and a Christian and a Bible believer who made the critical discoveries underlying HSP.

Evolutionists Are Two-Faced

In daily life, evolutionists go about saying evolution is a fact but before the Supreme Court they say evolution is merely a theoretical model.

Where Are All The Prehumans?

Why is it that the prehumans so conveniently disappeared off the face of the earth? There should, at least, be one continent inhabited by billions of prehumans. What happened? We’ll tell you what happened. There never were any prehumans. What about all of the prehuman fossils? It is interesting that all…all…of these fossils are described as “within the range of probability of 70% to 75%.” In other words, evolutionists have no certainty, only probability. But its even worse than that for evolutionist probability is closed-system probability; that is, it is based on a mental model of biological reality and not on biological reality itself.

How Evolutionists Think

Evolution is not merely a belief, it is a lifestyle. Whenever an evolutionist is confronted with facts that contradict their cherished belief their first response is, “How can I make the facts fit my belief?”

Why Atheists Are Stupid Morons Or The Impact Of Belief In God On Children

Atheists claim that belief in God has resulted in many evils throughout history. We’ve answered that nonsense elsewhere. Right now, we want to address an interesting and critical fact about belief in God. Throughout history, whenever children were taught belief in God:

99% of the time they turned out to be better adults compared to other times in history when children were not taught belief in God.

Reverse Evolution

Something that everyone overlooks is that if an ancient ape were to give birth to a prehuman or a prehuman were to give birth to a human being, who would they have offspring with since there would be no one eise of their kind. The prehuman would have to mate with an ancient ape but that would result in reverse evolution. The human being would have to mate with a prehuman but that, too, would result in reverse evolution. Reverse evolution means:

Evolution could never move forward.

The Gorilla-Human Mating Blocker

God, in his wisdom, created his living creations so that they cannot interbreed. A gorilla has 24 pairs of 48 chromosomes. A human being has 23 pairs of 46 chromosomes. This makes it organochemically impossible for a gorilla and a human being to have offspring together.

Why Did God Make Some Animals Superficially Resemble Human Beings?

Why did God make some animals superficially resemble human beings?


One reason is to highlight the difference between animal and human life. The orangutan, gorilla, chimpanzee, and bonobo have only one/vigintillionth (1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000th) the IQ of a newborn baby. So-called demonstrations of intelligence are programmatic inteligence, like programming a computer. As far as any so-called proofs of creative, problem-solving intelligence, in every case, the animal used heuristic (trial-and-error) neural net processing. In other words, the animals are simply biological neural nets. Whereas a human being transcends neural net processes by a factor of Rayo’s number.

In insanely oversimplified terms, a gorilla can peel a banana while a human being can tell you the molecular composition of the banana in Chinese.

The Dumbest Evolutionists

The dumbest evolutionists will tell you that it doesn’t matter if we call adaptation “evolution.” Such lack of precision is unscientific, which makes these evolutionists unscientific. They are not serious evolutionists. They are casual evolutionists. Don’t waste your time on them.


The origination of a new species from an existing species is called “adaptation,” not “evolution.” The belief in adaptation is harmless and contradicts no hermeticist, creationist, designist, indeterminationist, or biblical belief.

How To Identify The Dumber Evolutionists

The dumber evolutionists will tell you that evolution is the origination of a new species from an existing species. That, of course, is incorrect. Evolution is the belief that:

all species from a first simplistic life-form to modern man are, actually and/or virtually, consanguineously connected; that is, actually and/or virtually, connected by blood

For example:


Adaptation, The Little Engine That Couldn’t

Adaption is defined as the creation of a new species from an existing species where the new species differs in tiny ways from the parent species; for example, an orange butterfly instead of a yellow butterfly. Hyper-adaptation is defined as the creation of a new species from an existing species where the new species differs in huge ways from the parent species; for example, a flying dog instead of a regular dog. No, there are no flying dogs.

In fact, there are no instances of hyper-adaptation. There are reported instances of adaptation, which we have not been able to confirm but, for now, we’ll say they are true reports. In addition, adaptation has been reported to occur an average of only every one hundred thousand years. With adaptation’s track record, the evolutionary timeline should be tens of trillions of years instead of billions of years but that doesn’t fit the geological facts.

Finally, adaptation is not evolution and there is nothing about the concept of adaptation or even hyper-adaptation that conflicts with any hermeticist, creationist, designist, indeterminationist, or biblical truth.

Evolution: The Internal Missing Links

A missing link is a hypothetical life-form having some of the characteristics of a more primitive species and some of the characteristics of a more advanced species. The imaginary ape-man would be an example. Well, currently, 100 million billion trillion trillion (100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000) of these missing links are yet to be found.

Now, with advances in microbiology, we find that there are also internal missing links. These are hypothetical biomolecular structures (“bio-engines”) inside living things having some of the characteristics of a more primitive bio-engine and some of the characteristics of a more advanced bio-engine. Now, here, the situation is even worse because these bio-engines have nothing to evolve from and, if they did, we would still be missing 100 vigintillion (100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000) of them.

How will the evolutionists explain this?

Evolution: The Monkeys Won’t Stay In Line

Here is the familiar HES (Human Evolution Sequence):


What you were never told was that there was this “equally scientific” alternative HES (Human Evolution Sequence):


Does anyone see a problem (author is smiling)?

And then there is this “equally scientific” alternative HES (Human Evolution Sequence):


Again, does anyone see a problem (author is smiling again)?

In fact, there are 127,693 “equally scientific” alternative HESs (Human Evolution Sequences) that we have been able to dig out of the literature.

Preliminary information on the “HES ‘Controversy'” can be found at our L. F. Nexus Research Center on the EGP The Evolutionist’s Ape “Police Lineup.”

Evolution: Where’s The Evidence?

Currently, and the number grows daily, over 100 million trillion (100,000,000,000,000,000,000) genetic transmutations were required for the last prehuman to evolve into the first human being. So far, we have found 173, which, incidentally, means the prehuman could have also evolved into a horse or snake or whale or barnyard pig.

This is so hysterically funny and massively poignant, that nothing more needs to be said on the subject of genetic transmutations.