Directory: Departments: Expanding List


Original article: Directory: Departments: Expanding List'">

Directory: Departments: Expanding List

©2014 The L. F. Nexus Historical Research Center: 11g. All Rights Reserved.

Computer-Picked Related Post(s) (more relevant to less):

  1. Directory: Departments: Frozen List
  2. Posts Titles List


The Directory: Departments: Frozen List will rarely have new departments added to it and the Directory: Departments: Expanding List will have new departments added to it and will, occasionally, have departments removed from it.Arrows

Original article: Directories

©2014 The L. F. Nexus Historical Research Center: 11g. All Rights Reserved.

Computer-Picked Related Post(s) (more relevant to less):

  1. Research Center Whiteboard
  2. Directory: Departments: Frozen List
  3. Posts Titles List
  4. Can A Supreme Court Justice Be Removed From Office?
  5. The “Stupid People Club”

History Of The L. F. Nexus Research Center

Ninth Generation Library Grew Into The Tenth Generation Research Center

Eight Generation Grew Into The Ninth Generation

Seventh Generation Spawned The Eight Generation

Sixth Generation Morphed Into The Seventh Generation

Fifth Generation Morphed Into The Sixth Generation


Previous L. F. Nexus Generations Home Pages & Portals

Fourth Generation Home Page

Third Generation Home Page

Second Generation Home Page – Modernized

Second Generation Home Page – Original

First Generation Home Page

Original article:

History Of The L. F. Nexus Research Center

©2014 The L. F. Nexus Historical Research Center: 11g. All Rights Reserved.

Computer-Picked Related Post(s) (more relevant to less):

  1. The Fifth Generation Is Ready To Use
  2. Research Center Whiteboard
  3. What We Update & Revise
  4. L. F. NEXUS / We have begun wo…
  5. Prior Generations

Directory: Departments: Frozen List

Directory: Departments: Frozen List

Past Libraries

Original article: Directory: Departments: Frozen List

©2014 The L. F. Nexus Historical Research Center: 11g. All Rights Reserved.

Computer-Picked Related Post(s) (more relevant to less):

  1. Research Center Whiteboard
  2. Directory: Departments: Expanding List
  3. Directory: All Floors: Expands Daily
  4. Posts Titles List
  5. Directories

Research Center Whiteboard

Research Center Whiteboard
Temporary Message Center

We have converted the First Floor Directory area into a Frozen List Departments Directory area, where new departments will rarely be added, and, immediately after that area, we’ve added an Expanding List Departments Directory area, where new departments will be added and, occasionally, removed.

We’ve begun a Current Positions Snapshot section below so that everyone can know our current positions on key issues.

We have turned off our repetitive, introductory messages everywhere except our homepage, now believing these to be a bit distracting to our visitorship.

The link to the most recent article, at the top of our website, now includes the title of the article.

Original article: Research Center Whiteboard

©2014 The L. F. Nexus Historical Research Center: 11g. All Rights Reserved.

Computer-Picked Related Post(s) (more relevant to less):

  1. Directories
  2. History Of The L. F. Nexus Research Center
  3. Position Statement Summary Library
    Mix of Past & Current Vews
  4. A Word of Explanation
  5. Where To Find Our Current Thinking

Where To Find Our Current Thinking

Where To Find Our Current Thinking *** Revision #6 ***

Our current thinking on key subjects will now be found in our Current Positions Snapshot section just below.

Our current thinking on many subjects will now only be found at our parent portal The L. F. Nexus Think Tanks in the relevant think tanks. 

Our content spans many years.  During that time we have acquired massive amounts of new information and gained a host of new insights.  As a result, there have been changes in our thinking.  What this means to you is that, once in a very great while, you might find one article contradicting another.  How will you know what we really think in such a case?  Generally (in most cases), the answer is that the viewpoint expressed in the newer article overrules the viewpoint expressed in the earlier article.  (If you want to be absolutely sure about what we really believe about anything, contact us.)

Original article: Where To Find Our Current Thinking

©2014 The L. F. Nexus Historical Research Center: 11g. All Rights Reserved.

Computer-Picked Related Post(s) (more relevant to less):

  4. Position Statement Summary Library
    Mix of Past & Current Vews
  5. Research Center Whiteboard

Current Positions Snapshot


The legal component of our position is that abortion should never be allowed except to save the life of the mother-to-be.  More info at Abortion on our political think tank website American Political Intelligence.

American Psychiatric Association

This organization now believes that people are machines without free will and demands that everyone follow their teachings.  In other words, they have become a cult.

Autoeroticism (Masturbation)

The question of whether masturbation is a sin does not have a simple answer. Read our answer at Masturbation.


We believe in hermeticism, not evolution.  See Scientific Revolution: The Seven Keys on our evolution think tank website.


Gays don’t exist, Gay-perverts do.  See Are Gay-Perverts Mentally Ill? then, especially, our think tank on the subject of Gays – Gay Is Not.

Gays, How To Fight Against

Gays don’t exist and, if they did, they would, by definition, have no power to stop what they do.  God does not oppose the powerless; therefore, logically, God would not oppose Gays.  Therefore, when you are asked what your position on Gays is, answer, “If Gays existed, there would be no reason to oppose them.”


God works in different ways. He may work in your life differently than he does in ours. However, he probably works the same way in your life as he does in ours.

We believe in the existence of God (theism). We believe that God is involved in the affairs of humanity (the earthly lives of human beings) (providentialism). We believe that God creates the illusion that he is not involved in the affairs of humanity (virtual deism). We believe that God replaces divine assurance with special stamina in the lives of virtual deists. We believe that God replaces obvious providence with special luck in the lives of virtual deists.

We also believe in virtual reverse deism. Reverse deism is the delusion that God is too involved in our lives. Virtual reverse deism is:

The divinely created illusion of God’s excessive involvement in our lives.

This illusion tells us that God wants us to ignore inherently pointless suffering sent by him so that we appear (only appear, not actually) to be absolutely independent, even of God.


Islam is a primitive, psychologically enslaving religion of peoples still living in the Dark Ages.  The teachings of Islam are contradictory, which results in the instability and unpredictability of the Islamic population.  Islam is divided into several sects, some worse than others.  A follower of Islam is called a “Muslim.”

We explain Islam, removing any and all mystery surrounding the religion, at We Explain Islam (The Religion Of Muslims).

Finally, read Why Islam Is A Threat To America and visit our first anti Islam website Islam: The Trojan Religion.

Islam, A Threat To America

Read Why Islam Is A Threat To America and visit our first anti Islam website Islam: The Trojan Religion.

If you have courage and a strong stomach, visit the anti Islamic website The Muslim Issue to have your eyes opened to the horrendous things Muslims are doing in the United States and around the world.  Note that we have not reviewed the entire website; so, technically, we cannot guarantee perfect agreement with all of its content.

Islam, Atrocities

“Susie,” the woman in the photo below, is one of over ten million women, of all races and nationalities, burned with acid by “nonviolent,” “nonextremist,” “nonradical” Muslims in the last five years everywhere in the world in every country on earth. So, you will understand why we “feel a little uncomfortable” around Muslims and oppose their religion, Islam, which permits this.

“Susie,” 18, was burned on her face (her left eye dissolved) when a man whom she rejected for marriage poured acid on her. She has undergone plastic surgery 50 times.

This is one of the “mildest” photographs in our
Muslim Atrocities Photo Archives.


Photo courtesy of private contributor.

Koran (the Muslim “Bible”)

There are two main issues with the Koran.

Issue 1: Couplets

The Koran is a collection of couplets. A couplet is a pair of ideas that contradict each other.

This means that the Koran contains both peace-and-love verses and violence-and-hatred verses.

Issue 2: Lust

A Muslim may obey a peace-and-love verse when his lust allows him to and he may obey a violence-and-hatred verse when his lust allows him to.

When we study Muslim current events and Muslim history, we discover that:

Muslims’ lust more often than not leads them to obey the violence-and-hatred verses of the Koran.

Muslim Religion

See “Islam.”


As long as Muslims respect American law and tradition, seek no preferential treatment, and live with us in peace, they will be allowed in America. However, they must publicly sign the Declaration of Severance and agree, in writing, to use the Modern Koran, which removes all encouragements to jihad, hatred, violence, and mass murder. Note that the text of the Koran is not changed in the Modern Koran but explanatory notes have been added explaining that the time of the holy wars has past according to the new prophets of Islam. If Muslims don’t do these things, they will not be allowed to enter the U.S. or, if a citizen, they will be deported. In addition, we have been told that the anti Muslim organization MASS, the Muslim Assassination Squad, will be monitoring them and keeping an eye on them in case they get out of line. We are not Europe. Muslims will not do here what they are doing there. Also, less than 1% of our population may ever be Muslim. This rule will be enforced one way or another by some means. Finally, other restrictions will be put in place, as well.

Muslims, American

American Muslims are just as guilty as the 9/11 attackers because they refuse to break off from the rest of Islam. In order to confirm this, we polled 3,011 Muslims (the “Break Off” Poll). Here are the results:

  • No, I will not break off from the rest of Islam, even if violent. 2,997
  • Yes, I will break off but I must do so only in my mind. 10
  • Yes, I will break off. 4

Muslims, Are All Muslims Terrorists?

Are all Muslims terrorists? The answer to this question is not simple. The answer is no but, in effect, yes because of STS. See Terrorism: STS Syndrome & The Hidden Terrorist Threat.

Muslims, Savages

First, we exclude the women and children from this subject. They are, essentially, innocent victims of male Muslims.

Muslims are savages because:

  1. Muslims have no faith in their god, Allah.
  2. Muslims have no familial (family) relationship with their god, Allah.
  3. Muslims cling to the idea that Allah is their slavemaster.
  4. The lives of Muslims center on following the slave rules of their god, Allah.
  5. The slave rules of their god, Allah, include torturing and murdering people; especially, those weaker than themselves; especially, women and children.


We are Independents.  See our political think tank American Political Intelligence.

We will expand the Snapshot over time.

Original article:

Current Positions Snapshot

©2014 The L. F. Nexus Historical Research Center: 11g. All Rights Reserved.

Computer-Picked Related Post(s) (more relevant to less):

  1. Muslims Spreading Fake Korans
  2. The 1.8 Billion Muslims Myth
  3. How Muslims Cheat All Of Us Using The Koran (the Muslim “Bible”)
  4. Should Muslims Be Deported From (Kicked Out Of) America?
  5. The Koran In A Nutshell

A Word of Explanation

Updated February 19, 2014 at 12:25 AM CST

Since there is no shortage of websites for family, fun, sports, video games, movies, music, etc., etc., we have discontinued our efforts to develop The Super Nexus.

To access collections of tweets search our website using the words “Twitter Updates.”  Our tweets reveal the real-time, thought processes behind intellectual discoveries! You are there when the discoveries are made!  Modifications and tweaks to our positions happen so fast that our website does not necessarily report our current positions.  Our current positions are usually reported first in our tweet feed.  The most recent tweets report the most recent position changes.  We do not usually correct misspellings in tweets because doing so usually would break a train of thought.

In order to assure absolute fairness and impartiality, our censor team will be handling all blocking of tweeters according to a predetermined set of rules.  Blocked tweeters may appeal to have their access restored. The amount of material on our website is so extensive that we cannot guarantee the absence of inaccuracies and misinformation.  Where possible, always confirm reports from at least two other sources. A tiny bit of our content is satiricalSatire is brainy, entertaining criticism.  Satire should not always be taken literally.  Be sure not to mistake some of our satire for fact.  Some of our satire takes the form of irony, which is the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning.  Some of our satire individually or in combination with other forms of satire consists of hype, exaggeration, caricature, propagandism, sarcasm, parody, provocative rhetoric, strange zaniness, dark satire, complex satire, etc., etc. If you do not know what satire is, do not believe everything you read. We sometimes insert a totally moronic statement to keep you on the ball.  Don’t believe everything you read. We sometimes play a game we call “Gotcha.”  We post a series of patently false statements with some true statements mixed in and then say, “Gotcha!”  So, again, don’t believe everything you read. We also sometimes use provocative language to excite interest, words like “stupid” and “moron” and, on rare occasions, we use the language of extreme revulsion (for example, the word ”kill”) that may be misunderstood to be an expression of hatredBe assured that we hate no one! Based on the data and on biblical principles, homosexuality, etc. are sins for everyone!  We oppose gaypracs.  See “(3) Absexuals (“Gays” [note quotes])” at and numerous associated tweets for more information.

Original article:

A Word of Explanation

©2014 The L. F. Nexus Historical Research Center: 11g. All Rights Reserved.

Computer-Picked Related Post(s) (more relevant to less):

  1. OUR TWEETS> Our tweets REVE…
  2. Satire> Our tweets and webs…
  3. Twitter Updates for 2011-09-05
  4. Critics> We have posted in …

Position Statement Summary LibraryMix of Past & Current Vews

For our current positions, see Where To Find Our Current Thinking and Current Positions Snapshot above.

Summary Library Updated on February 19, 2014 at 3:41 AM CST by Dr. Michael Bisconti

Positions are not in alphabetical order at this time.

This summary library presents a mix of past and current views.  It does not, by any means, present all of our views, either past or current.

We now follow the “Golden Loophole,” which states:

The golden loophole only applies to audiences.  It does not apply to private conversations between two people.  It says, “Those we oppose may benefit from their delusion; therefore, while the undeceived deserve angry rebuke, we will be dispassionate (cool) for the sake of the former.” – Dr. Michael Bisconti

We now also follow the “Grand Conclusion,” which states: 

In every group there are people whose judgment as to what constitutes sufficient proof is different than that of most people; nevertheless, they have a right to their judgment and are ethically justified in following their judgment. – Dr. Michael Bisconti

We now also follow the “Great Redefinition,” which states:

The scientific definition of a phenomenon supersedes the popular, unscientific definition of that phenomenon. – Dr. Michael Bisconti

(1) Abortion

A woman might have latitude in the sight of God to have or not have an abortion if she acted in accordance with all possible knowledge and wisdom.  For the first time in history, mankind sometimes has the ability to determine whether an embryo is alive.  This ability is part of the “all possible knowledge and wisdom.”  An embryo is alive if it has a brain.  The brain may come into existence as an “iota” at the moment of conception.  The “virtual brain” (the part of the self that thinks) may come into existence at the moment of conception.

The question of abortion cannot be decided by science.  The question of abortion must be decided by an individual’s moral judgment.  One must judge whether it is good or evil to take a chance that abortion is killing an unborn child.  We say chance because, as shockingly cruel as it may sound to say this in the present context, not all killing is evil.  For example, when the mother’s life is at stake, do you save the life of the mother or of the baby?  See The Pro Smart Position for more information.

(2) Abcreationism (“Evolution” [note quotes])

We have renamed the Theory of Indeterminate Intelligent Design the “Theory of Indeterminate Design.”  The abbreviation for the theory is “XD.”  The “X” represents the unknown nature of the designing intelligence.

Dr. Michael Bisconti is the discoverer of the (formerly named) Theory of Indeterminate Intelligent Design or (formerly named) Indeterminate Intelligent Design for short (abbreviation [formerly] ”IID“).  This theory says that there are one or more intelligences behind the origin of all life-forms but that science doesn’t know whether it is a naturally occurring artificial intelligence (replaces evolution) or a preternatural intelligence (God) or a combination of the two or some other set of intelligences.  Science is limited to universal perception.  This is the only theory that is based on universal perception.  Intelligent Design is true but it is based on our local perception.

Both creationism and evolutionism involve transcendental beliefs.  Creationism involves a belief in God (religion).  (We are creationists.)  Evolution involves a belief in luck (mysticism).  (We agree with most of the nonmysticism part of evolution.)  We no longer hold to Original Dialecticalism as a scientific system.  Rather, we now hold to it as a scientific integration.  To indicate the change in significance, we now adopt the term “Original Dialecticalism Integration” or “ODI” for short.  ODI now encompasses IID.

Just Prior Position

Our new position is “Original Dialecticalism (Super Creationism).”

The Great Redefinition principle requires that we replace the nonsense word “evolution” with the word “abcreationism.”  The nonsense word “evolution” is supposed to mean the Godlike forces of nature that produce new species.  In fact, this is nonsense.  There are no such forces.  In reality, there is abcreationism.  The word “abcreationism” means the forces of nature theomorphized (to have attributed divine nature to ["treated as if they were God"]) that produce divergent life-forms.  Note that the nonsense word “evolution” is so entrenched in our culture that it might have to be retained in one or more instances for the relevant text(s) to continue to be readily understood.

Foundational Thinking

We have moved beyond some earlier ideas. We have also moved beyond some earlier ideas relating to phenomenology subsequent to the ideas below and that were expressed in some of our tweets.

We now know that the sticking point between evolutionists and nonevolutionists is the question of evidentiary sufficiency; that is what constitutes sufficient evidence to prove anything.  There is no scientific law that can settle the matter.  Therefore, we now see that both sides of the debate are morally, if not scientifically, justified in their positions.  The rest of this statement explains our position.

Our conclusions on the subject of evolution are based on science and science alone (see links below) and are only coincidentally consistent with our spiritual beliefs related to this subject.

We believe in the freedom of science behind H-evolution.  H-evolution is the hypothesis of evolution, as opposed to T-evolution, which is the theory of evolution, which is what is normally referred to by the word “evolution.”  To be clear, we do not believe that man descended from an ape.  See our XEGP discussion “The Hypothesis Proof.”

Most evolutionists present facts 10% of the time and the other 90% of the time they ask you to just trust them. Why is that?  – Dr. Michael Bisconti

You have to give the Devil his due; evolutionists may have a lot of facts. However, evolution is a credulous conclusion, not a fact. – Dr. Michael Bisconti

We agree with all of the facts and most of the interstitial conclusions of evolution. These, however, do not lead to the ultimate conclusion of evolution. – Dr. Michael Bisconti

Evolution never had, does not have, and never will have a logic tree.  Case closed. – Dr. Michael Bisconti

(3) Absexuals (“Gays” [note quotes])

Position Summary

No one knows whether Gays exist. If they did, they still would not be able to tell whether or not a given person was Gay.  Also, what some people perceive as the quality of ”Gayness” is an effect and not a cause.

The term “Gay” refers to an imaginary group of people; specifically, the imaginary group of people born with a genetic makeup that compels them to have sex with people of the same gender.

The term “Gayprac” refers to a real group of people; specficially, the real group of people who are not members of the imaginary group of people known as “Gays” and that have sex with people of the same gender.

Footnote: Women are included in the meanings of the terms “Gay” and “Gayprac.”

Post Sexual Dialecticalism

Sexual dialecticalism is now an incomplete analysis.  We no longer care what you claim to be -  Straight, Gay, or H-Type - since the existence of sexual orientation is uncertain and, if it did exist, it would still be unknowable.

God (the Bible) wants you to choose to be heterosexual.  This includes hermaphrodite H-types but, in their case, it is “complex heterosexuality.”  Based on the data and on biblical principles, homosexual, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender behavior are sins for everyone!

We oppose anyone who seeks to sexually brainwash anyone; most especially, anyone who seeks to sexually brainwash children!

We recognize the existence of nimsbacs (NMSBCs [negatively moral (sinful) sexual behavior categories]), which we call “gayprac,” “lesbianprac,” “bisexualprac,” and “transgenderprac,” along the lines of other terminology related by spelling.

Sexual Dialecticalism

With new scientific information we have now moved to a more complex position, which we have named “sexual dialecticalism.”  For some initial explanation see Sexual Dialecticalism.

For purposes of technical accuracy, the following needs to be understood in the light of our new position.

Beta “Gay” Truce

On September 27, 2011 at 1:41 AM CST, we declared a truce (“suspension of fighting”) between ourselves and the majority of “Gays,” who are the majority of Beta “Gays,” because most Beta “Gays” are morally blind and not deliberately evil.  However, make no mistake; Beta “Gays” are evil and mentally ill.  We will only be fighting Alpha “Gays,” who seek to brainwash our children.

We follow the “Evil Beast Principle.”

The Great Redefinition principle requires that we replace the nonsense word “Gay” with the word “absexual.”  The nonsense word “Gay” is supposed to mean a person who has the nature of one who is attracted to the same sex.  In fact, this is nonsense.  There are no such people.  In reality, there are absexuals.  The word “absexual” means a person who has the condition of one who is attracted to the same sex.  Note that the nonsense word “Gay” is so entrenched in our culture that it must be retained in a few instances for the relevant texts to continue to be readily understood.

Our conclusions regarding absexuals are based on science and science alone (see link below) and are only coincidentally consistent with our digust, not hatred, for this group of people. We have a charitable spirit toward absexuals but not toward their act.

Absexuals are mentally ill and virtually all absexuals are evil, cheating liars.  Our use of the words “evil,” “cheating,” and “liars” primarily reflects the actions of absexuals in 1973.  The term “mental illness” is not a good term because it implies disease of the brain.  Absexuals have no disease of the brain.  The correct term is “mental derangement.”  Mental derangement is the state resulting from damage to the “virtual brain.”  The virtual brain is the part of the self that thinks.  The virtual brain is damaged by evil belief.  An example of evil belief is the belief that you can fly if you jump off the roof of someone’s house.  If you want proof that absexuals are abnormal (deranged), read on:

For beginners (cartoon series): Little Johnny Campaign

For thinkers: The Gay Martian Chronicles

For deep thinkers: The Trojan Couch

Explanation of the “Gay Feeling” and the Brain

A person is not absexual because they experience the “Gay feeling.”

During adolescence (“teen years”), the brain (virtual brain [God]) provides instruction in the meaning of language through a variety of feelings.  One of these feelings is the “Gay feeling.”  Every teen experiences this feeling.  The brain (virtual brain [God]) provides this instruction so that a person will understand the meaning of the word “absexual” and for other reasons that we will explain later.  If a young person experiencing the Gay feeling comes under the influence of an absexual person, that absexual person might persuade the teen that they are absexual.  The teen, because of their limited knowledge and because of the massive absexual propaganda in our society today, might be defenseless against the spell of the absexual person.  This is why it is so important, parents, that you do not let your children associate with absexuals!

(4) Atheism

Atheism is not science.  With the advent of the Bisconti Jung Proof, we now know that atheists are, potentially (because they don’t know about the proof) or actually (because they know about the proof and reject it), mentally ill.

(5) Fideistic Dialecticalism

The community of God consists of theists and “omega theists” (see relevant tweets), who are the only real atheists.  Omega theists have a subpsyche factor (see relevant tweets) that qualifies them as the only real atheists.  Omega theists have no choice but to be atheists.  Now, many of you are probably mystified at this point.  Well, omega theists, who, for whatever reason known only to God, are unable to believe in theism are at least willing to be theists.

(6) Original Dialecticalism (Super Creationism)


(7) Brainwashers

There cannot be a standard as to whether a lethal counteroffensive should or should not be launched against brainwashers but we can say this:

It would not necessarily be a sin if we were to launch a lethal counteroffensive against a brainwasher.

(8) Theism

Theism is not necessary to get to heaven but the willingness to accept theism is.

(9) Gender Relations

Men and women are equal in the sight of God and are to be equally respected!

(10) The First Scientific Proof of the Existence of God in History

The “Bisconti Jung Proof”

Data has been pouring in from all over the world.  An even simpler, scientific proof of the existence of God has emerged.  Here is the proven thesis, which we call the “Bisconti Jung Proof” in honor of Dr. Michael Bisconti who discovered the proof and Dr. Carl Jung, who is a source of massive amounts of data that support the proof:

The God of the Bible (the King James Bible) is the constant (“collective” [note quotes]) unconscious.

You will find an abstract of a paper in preparation  at The “Bisconti Jung Proof.”

The “Bisconti Proxy Proof” is still valid but it takes a different approach and is much, much harder for people to follow.

The “Bisconti Proxy Proof”

The “Bisconti Proxy Proof” elegantly proves the existence of God from the proxy nature of the human intellect through the annihilation of the tyranny of matter!  Here is a super condensed version of the proof:

The unconscious mind “is” (note quotes) God.

See extensive explanation in our recent tweets.  Also see the “Articles” section in the right column. We will be developing a lengthy article over time.  In addition a book, desk encylopedia, and encyclopedic library are in the works.

Original article:

Position Statement Summary Library
Mix of Past & Current Vews

©2014 The L. F. Nexus Historical Research Center: 11g. All Rights Reserved.

Computer-Picked Related Post(s) (more relevant to less):

  3. Twitter Updates for 2011-09-14
  4. BOSS: Biological Origins Science
  5. Twitter Updates for 2011-09-26