Have Some Supreme Court Justices Really Discriminated In Favor Of Gay-Perverts?

Have some Supreme Court Justices really discriminated in favor of Gay-perverts? Well, listen to someone who should know, Justice Antonin Scalia. Justice Scalia said that the Supreme Court has:

…largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda.

What Should Be Our Policy On Gay-perverts?

What should be our political stance on Gay-perverts?

  1. We should not investigate them.
  2. Leaders, teachers, educators, etc. that seek to brainwash our children into believing being a Gay-pervert is normal should be stopped by any means whatsoever, short of maiming or killing these brainwashers.
  3. People should be educated in the truth about Gay-perverts and Gay-pervert activists from the public record – Satinover, Laumann, APA legal briefs, etc., etc.
  4. Supreme Court Justices that have discriminated in favor of Gay-perverts should be removed from office.
  5. Laws in favor of Gay-perverts should be rescinded (reversed).

Does A Good Candidate Have To Be A Perfect Candidate?

Well, I think that we should always start out looking for the perfect candidate. However, at some point, people’s ideas of what is perfect will clash. At that point, we need to ask ourselves, “What qualifications are indispensable?” Well, what qualifications will save lives?

Fighting abortion will save lives. Fighting Gay-perverts will not. Therefore, fighting abortion is more important than fighting Gay-perverts. Eliminating the national debt will save lives. This is because a future national debt will deprive people of money for food and the other necessities of life. So, fighting the national debt is more important than fighting Gay-perverts.

Directory: Departments: Frozen List

Directory: Departments: Frozen List

Past Libraries

Original article: Directory: Departments: Frozen List

©2014 The L. F. Nexus Historical Research Center: 11g. All Rights Reserved.

Computer-Picked Related Post(s) (more relevant to less):

  1. Research Center Whiteboard
  2. Directory: Departments: Expanding List
  3. Directory: All Floors: Expands Daily
  4. Posts Titles List
  5. Directories

Power Coalition Renamed
“Sane Majority”

The Power Coalition has joined the Sane Majority and now the new, combined organization is called by the name of the latter – the Sane Majority. The Sane Majority still stands for the policies at Standards. Here are some other things the Sane Majority stands for:

  • Moral Principle: Choose good over evil.
  • Love Principle: Choose love over nonlove.
  • Pain Principle: Choose nonpain over pain.
  • Safety Principle: Choose safety over nonsafety.
  • Biological Use Principle: Choose the biologically indicated function over the biologically unindicated function. (For example, a man is biologically designed for a woman and a woman is biologically designed for a man.)
  • Psychological Use Principle: Choose the psychologically indicated function over the psychologically unindicated function. (For example, a man is psychologically designed for a woman and a woman is psychologically designed for a man.)
  • Perversion Principle: It is possible for a person to swap sane principle for insane principle.
  • Heterosexuality Principle: Heterosexuality is consistent with the Biological Use Principle and the Psychological Use Principle.
  • Homosexuality Principle: Homosexuality is inconsistent with the Biological Use Principle and the Psychological Use Principle.
  • Homosexual Perversion Principle: Homosexuality is proof of the Perversion Principle.
  • Ethicist Principle: Ethicists deal with questions of what is right, what is wrong, what is sane (right and natural), and what is insane (wrong and unnatural), as a science. Note that some clergymen, by their training and experience if not by their title, are ethicists and some of them are pneumiatric ethicists (if an ethicist is not a member of the American Pneumiatric Association, they are not a pneumiatric ethicist).
  • Ethicist Limitation Principle: An ethicist does not necessarily have more ability to judge what is right, wrong, sane, or insane than the average person.
  • Homosexual Spectrum Principle: There are degrees of severity of the mental illness of homosexuality.
  • Humanity Principle: Human life is a combination of visible and invisible aspects. The visible aspect is seen. The invisible aspect is proven by the fact that it cannot be accounted for by what is seen and can only be accounted for by what is not seen.
  • Invisibility Principle: No one can know when the invisible begins because the knowledge of the existence of the invisible always follows the advent of the invisible and there is no way to measure the amount of time that has passed between the advent of the invisible and the knowledge of the existence of the invisible.
  • Life Invisibility Principle: No one can know when the invisible aspect of life begins because the knowledge of the existence of the invisible aspect of life always follows the advent of the invisible aspect of life and there is no way to measure the amount of time that has passed between the advent of the invisible aspect of life and the knowledge of the existence of the invisible aspect of life.
  • Life Principle: No one can know when human life begins since no one can know when the invisible aspect of life begins.
  • Belief Power Principle: Belief, in the absence of the possibility of knowledge and in the presence of the demand for belief by one or more principles of sanity, has the authority of knowledge.
  • Life Belief Principle: The existence of human life is a matter of belief that has the authority of knowledge and is not a matter of knowledge.
  • Nonlife Belief Principle: The nonexistence of human life is a matter of belief that has the authority of knowledge and is not a matter of knowledge.
  • Life Uncertainty Principle: The uncertainty of the existence of life is a matter of belief that has the authority of knowledge and is not a matter of knowledge.
  • Universality Principle: The ability to judge what is sane or insane is possessed by the vast majority of human beings.
  • Ordinary Principle: The ability to judge what is sane or insane does not require special training.
  • Psychiatry Principle: A psychiatrist does not necessarily have more ability to judge what is sane or insane than the average person.
  • Competence Principle: This principle deals with competence, not sanity. Competence is not sanity. Competence is “the ability to tell the difference between right and wrong.” A psychiatrist might have more ability to judge whether a person is competent than the average person. The psychiatrist might be aware of something of which the average person is unaware; for example, a brain tumor but brain tumors and all other medical conditions only relate to competence, not sanity.
  • Psychiatry Limitation Principle: A psychiatrist does not necessarily have more ability to judge whether a person is competent than the average person. This principle was added for the sake of clarity.
  • Neurology Principle: A neurologist, by the fact that by definition they devote more time to the study and practice of neurology than a psychiatrist, may be more qualified to judge whether a person is competent than a psychiatrist.
  • Neurology Limitation Principle: A neurologist does not necessarily have more ability to judge whether a person is competent than the average person.
  • Neurology Psychiatry Limitation Principle: A neurologist does not necessarily have more ability to judge whether a person is competent than a psychiatrist. This principle was added for the sake of clarity.
  • God Principle: Belief in the nonexistence of God is insane because it is based on an insane belief, the insane belief that one has examined every part of the universe and found that there was no God.
  • Money Principle: Money is not evil.
  • Sex Principle: Sex, that is, sexual intercourse, is, inherently (in itself), neither good nor evil but, at the same time, sex, in terms of its marital context, is good or evil.

Important Supreme Court Pervert Decisions

One, Inc. v. Olesen (1958)

The U.S. Post Office and the FBI deemed One: The Homosexual Magazine, a lesbian, gay, and bisexual publication, obscene, and as such could not be delivered via U.S. mail. The publishers of the magazine sued, and lost both the first case and the appeal.  The Supreme Court accepted the case and reversed it, marking the first time the Supreme Court ruled in favor of homosexuals.

Bowers v. Hardwick (1986)

The Supreme Court ruled 5–4 that consenting adults do not have a constitutional right to engage in homosexual acts in private, upholding a Georgia law.  The majority said the “right of privacy” under the Due Process Clause does not give homosexuals the right to engage in sodomy.  The “right to privacy” protects intimate marital and familial relations, but the Court said it does not cover gay sodomy because “no connection between family, marriage, or procreation on the one hand and homosexual activity on the other has been demonstrated.”  This decision, considered a serious blow to the gay-rights movement, was overturned in 2003’s Lawrence v. Texas decision.

Romer v. Evans (1996)

In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court struck down Colorado’s Amendment 2, which denied gays and lesbians protections against discrimination, calling them “special rights.”  According to Justice Anthony Kennedy, “We find nothing special in the protections Amendment 2 withholds.  These protections . . . constitute ordinary civil life in a free society.”

Boy Scouts of America v Dale (2000)

In another setback to the gay-rights movement, the Court ruled 5–4, that the Boy Scouts of America have a constitutional right to ban gays because the organization’s opposition to homosexuality is part of its “expressive message.”

Lawrence v. Texas (2003)

The Supreme Court, 6–3, overruled a Texas sodomy law and voted 5–4 to overturn 1986’s Bowers v. Hardwick decision.  “The state cannot demean their [gays’] existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime,” wrote Justice Kennedy in the majority opinion.  In his dissent to Lawrence v. Texas, Justice Scalia said the court has “largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda.”

United States v. Windsor (2013)

The Supreme Court ruled that the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional.  In a 5 to 4 vote, the court ruled that DOMA violated the rights of gays and lesbians.  The court also ruled that the law interferes with the states’ rights to define marriage.  It was the first case ever on the issue of gay marriage for the Supreme Court.  Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. voted against striking it down as did Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas.  However, conservative-leaning Justice Anthony M. Kennedy voted with his liberal colleagues to overturn DOMA.

Hollingsworth v. Perry (2013)

The Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage opponents in California did not have standing to appeal the lower court ruling that overturned the state’s ban, known as Proposition 8.  The ruling will remove legal battles for same-sex couples wishing to marry in California. However, the ruling did not directly affect other states.

The National Debt

I have been concerned about and fighting against the National Debt since 1961 when I was only twelve years old and the National Debt was less than 1/3 trillion dollars.  Today it is more than 62 times that:

18+ Trillion

So, what has our moronic federal government been doing for over 50 years?

More important, why have the American people let them do it?

Wake up America!  Eventually, if the debt keeps growing, everyone will lose all of their money.  Food, clothing, everything will be rationed!  Good-bye McDonalds!
Good-bye Internet!  Good-bye cell phones!
And that’s just on the first day!

Is Health Care A Good Idea?

Is health care a good idea?  Yes, but Obama, Hillary, and their Democratic Party have thought of the most stupid, moronic way of implementing (doing) it – Obamacare.

How To Tell If Your Government Is Stupid

#1  The “All Or None” Principle

Your government is stupid if it makes decisions that help only some of the people.

#2  The “Foreign Worker” Principle

Your government is stupid if it hires foreign workers instead of American workers.

#3  The “Goods” Principle

Your government is stupid if it allows foreign companies to sell goods in the U.S. when their countries won’t allow us to sell goods in those countries.

#4  The “More Goods” Principle

Your government is stupid if it allows foreign companies to sell more goods in the U.S. than their countries allow us to sell in those countries.

#5  The “Weapon Building” Principle

Your government is moronic (very, very stupid) if it allows foreign companies to build our weapons of war.

#6  The “Jobs” Principle

Your government is moronic (very, very stupid) if it does not fight to maintain U.S. manufacturing jobs.

#7  The “Job Number” Principle

Your government is moronic (very, very stupid) if it does not fight to increase the number of U.S. manufacturing jobs.

#8  The “Balanced Budget” Principle

Your government is moronic (very, very stupid) if it does not balance its budget (make sure it can’t spend more money than it has).

#9  The “National Debt” Principle

Your federal government is moronic (very, very stupid) if it does not seek to eliminate the national debt.

#10  The “Social Security” Principle

Your federal government is moronic (very, very stupid) if it does not maintain the fund needed to pay social security benefits.