The purpose of this article is to illustrate how angry the American people are with President Obama.
First, we oppose all vigilante action. Second, we have no connection whatsoever with the vigilante group "Insane Justice." Third, Insane Justice is a far left vigilante group.
Now, Insane Justice has announced that President Obama will be dead by August 15, 2014, even if it means having to use a vigilante suicide bomber.
We trust that the Secret Service will keep the President safe.
Original article: Vigilante Group “Insane Justice” Promises To Kill President Obama
©2014 The L. F. Nexus Historical Research Center: 11g. All Rights Reserved.
Computer-Picked Related Post(s) (more relevant to less):
- President Obama, Just Another Politician
- Should President Obama Be Impeached?
- Death Threats Against President Obama Triple Overnight
- PRESIDENT Obama> President …
- Is President Obama Controlled By Satan?
For those of you who are very young or very immature, note that words can be used in more than one sense. On The Accidental Vigilante website we use the word “vigilante” in two senses. One sense is the regular, Wild West, lawbreaking sense. The other is a figurative sense in which we are talking about law-abiding people who have a need that is not met by traditional law enforcement.
Vigilantes are morons because whatever good they wish to achieve can be achieved through martialism without breaking the law. See The Accidental Vigilante.
So far, at The Accidental Vigilante and posted here as well, we have provided two hypothetical (imaginary) examples of (lawbreaking) vigilante action based on numerous, real life, historical events. Their purpose is to show that (lawbreaking) vigilantism can be successful. However, martial action of any form must also never be lawbreaking and, if you know the law, it never has to be lawbreaking.
We have added additional explanatory material to The Accidental Vigilante, our think tank website dealing with the subject of vigilantism, to make it crystal clear to everyone, especially young people, that we have not, do not, and will not promote vigilantism.
Is it time to start killing evolutionists? The answer is, first, no and, second, it will never be time to start killing evoluionists. We understand how infuriating their ignorance and muleheaded stubbornness is but such killing is never justified (see the Bible and The Accidental Vigilante).
However, there may be a lesser form of martialism possible. We are working on this question.
Visit our anti evolutionist think tank EON Super Nexus.
Situation: A car drives by a home and fires guns into the home, killing a newborn baby.
Discovery: We find out about it the next day.
Our Response: We report the incident to the police and find out that they had already been informed.
Police Response: Police investigate and fail to find out who the killers were.
Our Response: We speak with our contacts in the neighborhood and find out the gang with whom the killers are associated. We provide this information to the police.
Follow-Up: Police question gang but cannot identify the killers.
Our Response: We seek to identify the killers. Gang will not cooperate. We make a threat assessment and a PCPA (police/courts protection ability) assessment, and develop a response plan.
Follow-Up: Three masked individuals deliver an ultimatum to the gang to give up the killers or suffer unspecified consequences.
Targets’ Friends’ (Gang) Response: Gang refuses to cooperate.
Our Response: We make a second threat assessment and a second PCPA (police/courts protection ability) assessment, and develop a response plan.
Follow-Up: Mysteriously, every day for a year, at least one person wearing the gang’s colors has both of their legs broken by three masked individuals.
Follow-Up: There have been no drive-by incidents in the community for the past three years.
Here is our first hypothetical example of vigilante action:
Situation: A man beats his wife every day for a month.
Discovery: We find out about it at the end of the month.
Our Response: We report the situation to the police.
Police Response: Police visit the home.
Follow-Up: Man beats his wife every day for a second month.
Discovery: We find out about it at the end of the second month, make a threat assessment and a PCPA (police/courts protection ability) assessment, and develop a response plan.
Our Response: We confront the man and tell him that he must stop or he will be stopped.
Target’s Response: Man beats his wife again that night.
Discovery: We find out about it the next day.
Our Response: An unidentified pair of masked individuals meet the man on his way home from work and break his right arm then tell him he will get worse if he beats his wife again. Anonymous donors support the couple financially until the man recovers and can return to work.
Follow-Up: Man has not beaten his wife for the past two years.